click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20121021
20121029
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
in health care, right? president obama is elected he obama cared becomes the law of the land for sure. it becomes institutionalized. it becomes nothing is impossible, but it becomes close to impossible to reverse four years from now. it will be operating then. people will have moved over. there will have been tremendous changes. a mandate would've been enforced already to 20,000 irs agents will get hired, which is absolutely ludicrous. just we need, 20,000 more irs agents. and there's almost no way to stop that because even if you have a republican house, which i think is almost for sure. nothing in life is for sure, but that's almost for sure. even if you were to have a republican senate, which is unlikely if obama gets elected, but possible. well, he could veto any attempt they would make to overturn obama cared. american people and reelecting president obama are basically reinforcing obama cared and accepting it as their future. if a president romney is elected, even without a republican senate, basically the present those in the house about the same in the senate was then one or t
in the hall was very interesting watching those obama zingers come one after the other. it's going to be interesting to see how those play a very aggressive performance by the president. the question whether it will seem a little too aggressive, the republicans are already charging he didn't seem presidential than some of those moments. on the flip side, as you were saying, there was some concerns that we are seeing on the right already about what romney is aggressive enough. did he try to hard to look presidential and show some bipartisan spirit and agree with the president but not in that making his own foreign policy perhaps he should have. >> i love the calculation of calibration. how to out the debate in the head to think about how aggressive july look, how aggressive do myself? it was so clear that mitt romney who could be oisin in the program was never going to flinch, never going to show a flash of anger and it's clear barack obama in every debate does not like mitt romney. by the end of you saw there was a shot on some of the different shows where you could see both of the
point margin and begin in 2008 they backed john mccain over barack obama by almost 70 points. now clearly this is not a swing group. it's noted at all closely divided and it absolutely does not swing back and forth between the two parties from election to election. now at the other end of the political spectrum, we have white catholic liberals. also not a swing vote. in 2000 white catholic liberals voted for gore than bush by more than five to one. we saw the same kind of margin in 2004. and in 2008 they voted for obama over john mccain by seven to one. it's not a swing group. it's not closely divided and not prone to swing from one party to another. hispanic catholics tend to resemble white catholic liberal in the voting pattern. they're not quite as one sided. we see a similar pattern. in 2000 about two-thirds of hispanic catholics vote for gore over bush and kerry over bush in 2004. in 2008, three quarters of the latino catholics voted for obama compared. one quarter who supported john mccain and we see the same kind of pattern among other nonhishispanic minority seven in ten h
of uncertainty. president obama said at the sequester that it will not happen. but at the same time can be certain to veto legislation that's not to his liking, relative to the broader fiscal picture. what you think is going to happen in the next few weeks? >> will first come the thank you for inviting me into the government executive meeting group in the hospitality and pwc for hosting. it is a fun event, particularly to have the opportunity to come back and speak with so many important public servant to the success of whatever happens next. as we all know, it is one thing to take a vote in congress would like to think were in charge of everything. i remember that very distinctly. but we know there's good people that have to come and implement the decision, whether it's by the president or by the congress and hopefully jointly. and that's all of you, sit thank you for your service. there were a couple of people who had i. guess the audacity to come up and tell me they are either current or former omb years. i'm sorry for that. i won't identify you to the rest of the folks in the room b
those who have waited most notably president obama and governor romney october 3rd. romney. every three economy has good regulation at the same time it can be excessive. the dodd/frank has a number prohibitions with unintended consequences that are harmful for the economy and killing regional small banks five would repeal and replace it. >> president obama it is because of reckless behavior on wall street putting mean street address we had to step and nfl since the 1930's so the question think we have to much oversight? senator warner of virginia, congress never gets it rice with massive reform legislation the first time through. you head out then you come back to do it correctly. secretary of treasury tim geithner. >> with strong defense of the dodd/frank act. remember the financial crisis of 2008 you read of the hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on lobbyist to repeal financial reform. they're not perfect but in place would have limited the financial crisis. basel iii capital and -- requirements and burdens were intended for our big banks would effectively put community banks
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5